Station
|
Color
|
Magnetite
|
Size
|
Texture
|
Wentworth
|
Sorting
|
Comp.
|
Maui
|
mixed
|
yes
|
1.5 mm
|
rounded
|
sand
|
well
|
rocks
|
Klamath
|
black
|
no
|
1.5 mm
|
angular
|
sand
|
moderate
|
rocks
|
Hampton
|
light
|
no
|
1 mm
|
angular
|
sand
|
moderate
|
rocks
|
Salinas
|
light
|
no
|
.3 mm
|
angular
|
sand
|
very well
|
rocks
|
Edgartown
|
light
|
no
|
1 mm
|
subrounded
|
sand
|
moderately
|
rocks
|
Virgin
|
light/black
|
no
|
.1
|
angular
|
sand
|
poorly
|
rocks
|
St. Martin
|
light
|
no
|
varies
|
angular
|
sand
|
very poor
|
rocks
|
Pine
|
light/clear
|
no
|
.1
|
subrounded
|
sand
|
well
|
rocks
|
The “Maui” sand must be from a beach with very high-energy waves because of its rounded shape. It must be from a marine source because there are no holes that hint at a volcanic origin, plus the colors are mixed, which means it could be accumulated from/traveled from many different places. The round edges are another hint at a long journey for this sand. Since it is well-sorted, it must be from the water, since water naturally sorts based on size and density.
The “St. Martin” sand must be from a calmer beach because it’s angular and less broken down than the Maui sand. The variety of surface features and textures hint at a variety of sources- most likely land-based due to the poor sorting and harsh texture. The size also varies greatly. It is unlikely for this sand to be from the ocean because water sorts very well/usually rounds off the grains.
No comments:
Post a Comment